Did the Paralympics really change our opinions and understanding of disability? Or did they just highlight the abilities rather than disabilities?
It is without doubt, that the Games left everyone amazed and enlightened, leaving even the most cynical person more patriotic than ever. But now they are over, how much has really changed?
Disability is often a taboo subject; people don't know how to react to it, more often than not because they don’t understand it. Hundreds of articles tell us that the Paralympics made a difference but I think this opinion is a bit naïve. Yes, we were impressed, proud, dumbfounded even, by the capabilities of those ‘less able’ to win, in competitions many of us couldn’t possibly imagine doing but now, we are back to reality.
Currently, I am working on a campaign with charity ‘Daisy UK’, whose aim is to get disabled people involved, rather than isolated. Years of evidence shows that society is often ignorant around disability. We think we know it all but we don’t.
One teacher’s idea of getting a blind boy involved, was to replace a football with a space hopper. With an accepting mind, she'd have known all she had to do was get a ball with a bell inside. Instead of allowing the boy to be involved and included, she became the initiator of his isolation.
When we're in a restaurant, bar or shopping centre, do we really now look at a disabled person exactly the same as the person next to them, as we should, simply as a result of the Paralympics, or are we still conscious that our glance could be misconstrued as a stare?
I think the Olympics and Paralympics may have improved and shaped our understanding of disability but to say they changed our understanding was overambitious.